Lord of Darkness

1

November 23, 2013 by Laird

Thomas Ligotti is one of the finest horror writers alive. His imagination is a wickedly powerful engine. It rumbles with enough force to shake the bones of HPL himself. From what I understand, Ligotti is also a kind and good man. This said, I am far less enamored of his pessimist/antinatalist philosophy. His indulgences in that arena smack of sophistry. The self-obliterating darkness that works in his fiction becomes appalling in reality, moreso in the context of the sort of cultish veneration that pessimist philosophy and antinatalism enjoy.

It is interesting that for me Ligotti presents a similar dichotomy as Lovecraft. In both cases, the untenable nature of their world view is the precise element that makes their art so potent.

If you’re interested in Chambers, Smith, and Lovecraft, Ligotti should be on your list. This is a good place to start.

Courtesy of Sergiy Krykun

One thought on “Lord of Darkness

  1. Tim Jeski says:

    I am trying to figure out what the origin of the comment “smacks of sophistry” is, Laird.
    Just curious.
    Thanks

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blood Standard

Swift to Chase

Man with No Name

Matthew Revert Art

X's for Eyes

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 5,294 other followers

%d bloggers like this: